September 20th, 2014

Mr. Twister

Выборочный милитаризм

Странная авторша появилась в Като, Эмма Эшфорд.
Тут разумно пишет: Arming Ukraine’s government is foolhardy at best. Even if Ukraine were central to U.S. interests, the United States cannot possibly provide enough military aid to allow Ukraine to prevail against the Russian military. Such aid has the potential to escalate the situation and undermine a diplomatic settlement. Giving Ukraine a “special defense status” is an even worse idea, especially if it were to commit NATO to the military defense of Ukraine. Luckily, the Obama administration seems determined to give Poroshenko a public relations boost—rolling out the red carpet for his visit—and nothing more.
А тут безумно: Scottish independence would severely impact the capabilities of the RUK to act as a partner on foreign and defense issues. the RUK is expected to retain a U.N. Security Council seat (and veto) in the event of independence, but the country would be smaller, poorer, and less able to commit to joint ventures with the United States. [...] But the biggest security issue with an independent Scotland by far comes down to nuclear submarines. The yes campaign has pledged that the future Scotland will be nuclear-free. [...] Neither Scotland, nor the RUK, nor both together would make for the kind of dependable and trustworthy partner Washington has grown accustomed to in London.
Как два разных человека.
Mr. Twister


Высшая степень растворения в коллективе - это назвать ребенка из тех соображений, чтобы его поменьше дразнили в школе. Например: зачем его так назвали?! его же будут дразнить в школе!